Racism played part in 1996 arrest, witnesses say
By David Rising, Standard-Times staff writer
NEW BEDFORD--Echoing past civil rights complaints against city
police, witnesses testified yesterday that officers used racist language and
excessive force when arresting a black woman two years ago.
Several defense witnesses testified in 3rd District Court that Officer Michael
Jesus used racial slurs as he arrested Shawndre Grace for disturbing the peace
on May 11, 1996.
"He had her arms behind her, pushed her down, pulled her back up by the back of
her hair, that's when he called her a black (expletive)," testified Kelly Grace,
the defendant's sister.
Supporting her testimony were Ms. Grace's colleague, Sandra Machnick, Ms.
Machnick's former husband Stephen and Brian Anacleto, who is now Ms. Grace's
husband, all of whom witnessed the incident.
The testimony came in the second day of the trial of Ms. Grace and Mr. Anacleto,
who were both charged with disturbing the peace and resisting arrest in
connection with the incident. Ms. Grace faces a further charge of assault and
battery on a police officer.
Mr. Machnick was also charged with disturbing the peace that night, but was not
on trial yesterday. Mr. Machnick and Mr. Anacleto are white. Officers had
testified Tuesday that it was not the police, but Ms. Grace who had yelled the
racial epithets.
Police also testified that she asked, "Are you going to kill me like you did
Morris Pina?" referring to the black man who died while in a police cell in
1990.
The Pina case -- one of four civil rights suits against the police in the last
five years--was settled in 1996, with $550,000 going to the man's sister. Ms.
Grace's group had been at the Veterans of Foreign Wars hall for an event hosted
by her employer, the Fairhaven-based Nemasket Group, which works with adults
with developmentally disabilities.
As the function was winding down, Ms. Grace, her sister, Kelly, Mr. Anacleto,
Mr. Machnick and his then-wife Sandra went to another section of the hall to
have drinks.
While Shawndre and Kelly Grace were at the bar, witnesses testified that a
patron said, "We don't serve your kind here." Mr. Anacleto then walked over to
the bar and asked what was going on.
A bouncer told all three to "get the hell out" and the bartender called police,
witnesses testified.
When police arrived, the group, including Mr. and Mrs. Machnick, went outside,
where Ms. Grace, Mr. Anacleto and Mr. Machnick were all arrested.
The case against Ms. Grace and Mr. Anacleto was originally dismissed in May 1997
by District Court Judge John A. Markey for lack of prosecution. However, the
case was dismissed without prejudice, allowing police to reinstate the charges,
which they did, resulting in this week's trial.
Ms. Grace's original lawyer, Lorraine Rousseau, testified yesterday that she was
approached by Assistant District Attorney Matthew Burke, Jr. to try to work out
a deal to prevent it from coming to trial.
"Mr. Burke indicated it was out of his hands whether the charges were filed
(again) ... and if Ms. Grace would consider signing a waiver of the civil suit,
the police might reconsider the charges," Ms. Rousseau testified. Mr. Burke,
who is prosecuting the current case, would not comment while the trial is
ongoing. No civil suit has been filed by Ms. Grace or anyone else in connection
with the incident.
Officer Jesus testified that he had "absolutely not" talked with Ms. Rousseau
regarding pressing charges after the initial dismissal, but she testified to the
contrary. Officer Jesus "indicated that he wanted to inform me that the charges
had not been re-filed, but that they could be in an instant on his computer at
the station," Ms. Rousseau testified. "I asked him if the reason he was
considering re-filing was because of the civil suit in question and he indicated
yes. He indicated that he really didn't want to re-file the charges, but that he
was worried ... he indicated to me that he had to protect himself because he had
a family, had a home and could not afford to be sued by Ms. Grace."
The alleged racial epithets yelled by Ms. Grace were attributed to her in a
supplemental police report written by Officer Jesus.
But Donald Brisson, Shawndre Grace's and Mr. Anacleto's current attorney, said
he had never received a copy of that report and Ms. Rousseau testified that she
had never received the report originally. Judge Robert Kane ruled yesterday
that the omission of evidence was not sufficient to declare a mistrial, but did
give Mr. Brisson the option of either another full cross-examination of Officer
Jesus or having Officer Jesus and another officer's testimony stricken entirely
from the record.
"The testimony was so inflammatory, I cannot believe that (the jury) could
disregard it," said attorney Brisson, asking for the cross-examination option.
On that cross-examination, Mr. Brisson asked Officer Jesus exactly when the
supplemental report was written and the officer testified that it was done the
day of the arrest. Officer Jesus testified that the supplemental report had not
shown up on either the May 11 or May 17 police reports given to Mr. Brisson
because of a Police Department computer glitch. He said the case's primary
officer, Antonio Mendes, was working on the report on one computer in the North
End Station while he was working on the supplemental report on another computer.
Because a line on Page 2 was not checked off "Y," indicating that there was a
supplemental report, it never printed with Officer Mendes' report, Officer Jesus
testified.
"It still happens today; it happens all the time," Officer Jesus told the jury
of five men and one woman.
But Mr. Brisson read back some of Officer Jesus testimony from Tuesday that
contradicted yesterday's statement. "You testified (Tuesday) 'I wasn't in the
station when Officer Mendes filed his report," Mr. Brisson read from the
transcript. Officer Jesus also testified that he first became aware that a
civil suit might be filed against him after hearing of a July 17, 1996, article
in The Standard-Times on the incident. He said he did not seek the advice of an
attorney.
After Mr. Brisson showed him his testimony from Tuesday, however, Officer Jesus
changed his mind. "I was concerned with regards to there being a possible civil
suit, so I saw a lawyer," he told the court.
With the inconsistencies in his testimony on the cross-examination, Judge Kane
told the jury that they could choose to disregard any of Officer Jesus testimony
given during the trial.
The case continues today at 9 a.m., with Ms. Grace taking the stand in her own
defense.